TAGS
ON CAMPUS
STUDENT LIFE
OFF CAMPUS
EDUCATION

GOVERNMENT
MONEY
COOL
VARSITY BLUES
UTSU
ADMINISTRATION
BIOLOGY
ART
MUSIC
FOOD & DRINK
ELECTIONS
IN THE LAB
FACULTY
TECHNOLOGY
HEALTH
FILM
PROFILE
NUMBERS
INTERVIEW
LITERATURE
PSYCH
BRIEFS
THEATRE
LOVE & SEX
DESIGN
GENDER
ENVIRONMENT
LONG FORM
POP CULTURE
THE VARSITY
SPACE
LAW
PRO SPORTS
SIMCOE HALL
TORONTO
HUMAN RIGHTS
MISSISSAUGA
UTSU DEFEDERATION
FROSH
SCARBOROUGH
PHOTOGRAPHY
INFOGRAPHICS
FAITH
BEST OF 2012
GUIDES
LGBTQ
FASHION
RACE
DRUGS
ALUMNI
EUREKA
EDITORIAL
DANCE
SGRT
RELIGION
JOURNALISM
INTRAMURALS
JOB MARKET
COMMUTE
INVESTIGATIVE
PODCAST
University of Toronto's Student Newspaper Since 1880

Rob Ford is a fool, but he’s our fool

Even Rob Ford’s critics should be concerned about him losing his office on a technicality

By Eric Vanderbeek
Published: 5:49 pm, 9 September 2012
Vol CXXXIII, No. 02 under

Two years ago, Toronto mayor Rob Ford voted on a council motion to prevent himself from having to pay back $3,150. Ford had solicited the money in donations for his football foundation using City of Toronto stationary, and city council had ordered him to repay it on a recommendation from the city’s integrity commisioner. Ford is now the defendant in a lawsuit, filed by Toronto buissinessman Paul Madger, in which Madger alleges that Ford’s vote to excuse himself from repaying the donations violated the “Municipal Confict of Interests Act.” Now Ford will defend his position in front of a judge and assert that he didn’t do anything wrong.

Whether or not he did anything wrong is not really important. What is important is that he could lose his title of Mayor of Toronto over this matter. When he took office in December 2010, it was not because of suspicious political activity, backroom deals or football donations. Surprising as it may be to many of us, he was elected. A possible conflict of interest in no way supersedes this all-important fact. The city of Toronto elected Rob Ford as mayor, and for a judge to decide that he is no longer worthy of that title is simply undemocratic. Had he committed some form of election tampering it would be another matter, but in this instance the allegations against the mayor are irrelevant to the election.

I’m sure there are many Torontonians who are licking their chops at the prospect of ousting Ford before his term ends. Whether that is because of his often questionable decisions as mayor or his ridiculous weight-loss fiasco, I don’t disagree. But I didn’t vote in the municipal election and judging by the fact that Ford won, neither did many of his detractors. Those who voted should not have their engagement in democracy overruled by a judge.

More importantly, if Rob Ford is tossed from City Hall his supporters will cry foul, saying that Ford’s opponents had whined him out of office. This would make them more likely to vote for Ford again should he choose to run in the next election.

So let’s relax. Let’s allow Ford finish his term in office and continue to make blunders as he has in this conflict of interest affair. Maybe then, come the next election, his former supporters will know better. Let them finally arrive at the same conclusion many of us had already reached, when Ford substituted policy making for a weight-loss competition against his brother.

  • Joe Smith

    Get the facts right. It was both two years ago and much more recently. February 2012 in fact,

  • Joe Smith

    “Whether or not he did anything wrong is not really important.”
    I hope you do not intend to be a law student one day.

    • Anonymous

      seriously. it actually IS important. Really important.

      Eric, your argument is invalid.

    • Spencer

      Its a politically motivated move against a mayor who has certainly made
      his fair share of enemies, but whether you agree with him or not, the
      mandate he was given by the people of Toronto should supersede this
      violation of the council charter, especially considering how small the
      amount was, and that the recipient was a CHARITY! It’s not like he
      embezzled city funds or anything, this was a private donor who when
      offered the money back by Ford (according to his own statements
      admittedly) refused it. Listen, I voted for Smitherman in 2010, and
      there’s no way I’d vote for Ford if/when he runs for reelection at the
      end of his designated term, but if he were kicked out of office for this
      and allowed to run again, there is no question in my mind that he would
      have my vote. The importance of the office of mayor of this city is
      much bigger than this issue.

  • Yogi Bear

    If his supporters continue to support him through a situation where he clearly broke the law, then I doubt they would change their mind regardless of whether he is removed from office or not.

  • Michael

    To be clear, it is alleged that Mayor Rob Ford violated Ontario’s Municipal Conflict of Interest Act. Section 5 outlines the duties of the member of council in order to avoid such a conflict. Section 10 of the Act requires that, should the judge find there to be a conflict, the seat of the member shall be declared vacant. (read the act yourself here:
    http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90m50_e.htm). Whether or not he did anything wrong is, in fact, quite important.