TAGS
ON CAMPUS
STUDENT LIFE
OFF CAMPUS
EDUCATION

GOVERNMENT
MONEY
COOL
VARSITY BLUES
UTSU
ADMINISTRATION
BIOLOGY
ART
MUSIC
FOOD & DRINK
ELECTIONS
IN THE LAB
FACULTY
TECHNOLOGY
HEALTH
FILM
PROFILE
NUMBERS
INTERVIEW
LITERATURE
PSYCH
BRIEFS
THEATRE
LOVE & SEX
DESIGN
GENDER
ENVIRONMENT
LONG FORM
POP CULTURE
THE VARSITY
SPACE
PRO SPORTS
LAW
SIMCOE HALL
TORONTO
HUMAN RIGHTS
MISSISSAUGA
UTSU DEFEDERATION
FROSH
SCARBOROUGH
PHOTOGRAPHY
INFOGRAPHICS
FAITH
BEST OF 2012
GUIDES
LGBTQ
FASHION
RACE
DRUGS
ALUMNI
EUREKA
EDITORIAL
DANCE
SGRT
RELIGION
JOURNALISM
INTRAMURALS
JOB MARKET
COMMUTE
INVESTIGATIVE
PODCAST
University of Toronto's Student Newspaper Since 1880

SMC writing centre hours slashed

Confusion reigns as administration works to replace popular resource

By Dan Smeenk
Published: 3:50 am, 17 September 2012
Modified: 6 pm, 19 September 2012
Vol CXXXIII, No. 03 under
BERNARDA GOSPIC/THE VARSITY
UPDATED

The St. Michael’s College Writing Centre will adopt radically reduced operating hours for this academic year, The Varsity has learned.

The centre will be open for a single day on Thursdays, down from its Monday through Friday availability in previous years. First- and second-year students will have priority in booking the new reduced time slots.

Resources that had been previously allocated to the writing centre are to be devoted to alternative initiatives around the college according to St. Michael’s College principal Dominico Pietropaolo. The reallocation is intended to fill the void left by the writing centre’s new hours, and will include a personal librarian program, library research centre, research and writing workshops, and a new website.

The decision to reconfigure writing resources at St. Michael’s College was made by Pietropaolo, who said he had consulted students, and staff including Steve Hoselton, the director of the centre, beforehand.

“There was not complete agreement on all sides,” said Pietropaolo, “but compromises were made which I believe left everybody relatively satisfied.”

Hoselton declined to comment to The Varsity on the changes, or his involvement in the consultative process described by Pietropaolo.

“I’m not 100 per cent informed,” said SMCSU president Mike Cowan. “It is on my radar, and I am concerned. It was a useful resource.”

Cowan said he had not yet consulted with Pietropaolo about the changes but had been in contact with the principal’s office about scheduling a future meeting.

News of the changes comes amidst confusion and speculation about the future of the centre, which is based in Kelly Library. Rumours this summer suggested that the SMC writing centre was to close entirely.

“I used the SMC writing centre for the summer courses that I took,” said Yves Utanes Lamanilao, adding that she found the service to be very helpful. “I just hoped there would be a lot more available time slots to make an appointment and use the centre. I remember having to watch the online schedule closely in order to get a space.”

Students like Lamanilao may be disappointed by the new course laid out by Pietropaolo. While the centre is to remain open for one day a week, many students and staff at the college still have only a vague idea of the changes to come.

“I’m still attending meetings trying to figure out what the new system is,” says St. Michael’s College campus life coordinator Christina Peter. Peter hopes to clarify the situation to the student body once she herself has received more information.

“I’m waiting for the go-ahead,” said Peter. “Once I understand what’s going on, it will be all systems go.”

Three of the services touted by Pietropaolo, including the writing centre, the personal librarian program, and the library research centre will continue to emphasize one-on-one help with writing and research. There will also be workshops offering group sessions aimed at undergraduates.

According to Pietropaolo, the operating hours of all three facilities will be roughly equivalent to the availability previously offered at the writing centre. All of the changes have already been implemented, except for the new website, which has been held up by technical difficulties. Pietropaolo promised Friday that the new site is likely to be online “within the next few days.”

Pietropaolo said that the changes were a result of his administration’s focus on “efficiency,” and not the result of a budget cutback. Cowan alluded to financial difficulties faced by the college, but stopped short of attributing the change in hours to the college’s budgetary situation.

In an interview with The Varsity, Pietropaolo suggested that the changes would allow staff at the centre, who are full-time employees, to work full-time, rather than for only a few hours each week.

Last year, staff at SMC including the writing centre employees unionized to form Unit 4 of CUPE 3902. It was not immediately clear what role the union has played in recent changes.

  • Not Clear?

    “It was not immediately clear what role the union has played in recent changes.”
    “Not immediately clear”? Considering that the writing centre was conveniently closed on the heels of the writing centre employees choosing to unionize leads me to assume that union busting on the part of St. Mike’s was a contributing factor. Did the journalist consider asking officials at the Union or union members their views on the loss of their own job?

    • Dan Smeenk

      Hi Not Clear?, this is the journalist who was the main author
      of the article.

      I did ask Principal Pietropaolo if any employees had been
      laid off as a result of the changes. He said that no one had been, and that the
      members of the writing centre staff, who are all full time employees of the
      university, were merely shifted to other writing centre areas mentioned in the
      article. No one lost their jobs, or even as far as I can tell were they even
      scheduled back as a result of the changes.

      You bring up an intriguing point about the union. I had not
      been aware that the writing centre staff had formed a union until it was brought
      to my attention by reading the final draft of my article, after edits by my
      editor. I won’t promise that I’ll follow
      up on that, mainly because I have a lot to do, but if I have the time and
      inclination to do so, the union’s take on this is important and I think I’ll
      try to find their representative to hear them out. I don’t
      believe this was an example of union busting, or that this was done with that
      in mind, but their perspective is certainly important.

      ad formed a union until it was brought
      to my attention by reading the final draft of my article, after edits by my
      editor. I won’t promise that I’ll follow
      up on that, mainly because I have a lot to do, but if I have the time and
      inclination to do so, the union’s take on this is important and I think I’ll
      try to find their representative to hear them out. I don’t
      believe this was an example of union busting, or that this was done with that
      in mind, but their perspective is certainly important.

      • Ace reporting

        @Dan Smeenk: “I won’t promise that I’ll follow up on
        that, mainly because I have a lot to do”. Wow. Yet another
        example of the crack journalism we’ve come to expect from the Varsity.

        The propensity of the Varsity’s “journalists” to not consult major
        stakeholders in the stories they cover — in particular when it comes to CUPE
        3902 and other campus trade unions (cf. Rida Ali’s “coverage” of
        negotiations last year between the union and the admin) — speaks volumes about
        a complete lack of integrity and downright laziness on the part of the
        editorial team. Do your homework.

        Asking the employer about the effect of job-loss on employees, incidentally, is
        akin to asking the cat’s opinion on whether the mouse it just ate is upset at
        the loss of its life. Although I’m sure that the esteemed principal is
        correct in stating that no full-time employees lost their jobs, he neglects to
        mention the current employment status of the writing instructors that had
        previously been employed on contract. It seems odd that contract
        employees who had enjoyed predictable employment and full-time hours prior to
        unionization would suddenly be deemed unnecessary post-unionization. It
        seems odder that subsequent to not renewing their contracts, all the work they had formerly performed
        has been assigned to the head of the writing centre.

        But given all the effort you’ve put into researching this story, you’re
        probably right: this isn’t an example of union-busting.

  • JJ

    The laziness of this “journalist” is astonishing. Perhaps, you may have wanted to actually go talk to some actual instructors, students, etc about this story …

  • omer

    I want to echo the other comments. This is yet another instance of poor journalism by the Varsity. “It was not immediately clear what role the union has played in recent changes”??? So, it seems you could have easily called CUPE 3902 to find out. Seems easy, no?