TAGS
ON CAMPUS
STUDENT LIFE
OFF CAMPUS
EDUCATION

GOVERNMENT
MONEY
COOL
VARSITY BLUES
UTSU
ADMINISTRATION
BIOLOGY
ART
MUSIC
FOOD & DRINK
ELECTIONS
IN THE LAB
FACULTY
TECHNOLOGY
HEALTH
FILM
PROFILE
NUMBERS
INTERVIEW
LITERATURE
PSYCH
BRIEFS
THEATRE
LOVE & SEX
DESIGN
ENVIRONMENT
GENDER
LONG FORM
POP CULTURE
THE VARSITY
PRO SPORTS
SIMCOE HALL
SPACE
LAW
MISSISSAUGA
TORONTO
UTSU DEFEDERATION
HUMAN RIGHTS
FROSH
SCARBOROUGH
PHOTOGRAPHY
INFOGRAPHICS
FAITH
BEST OF 2012
GUIDES
LGBTQ
FASHION
RACE
ALUMNI
EUREKA
DRUGS
EDITORIAL
SGRT
DANCE
RELIGION
JOURNALISM
INTRAMURALS
JOB MARKET
COMMUTE
INVESTIGATIVE
PODCAST
University of Toronto's Student Newspaper Since 1880

Trudeau has a great set of assets

With Justin, the Liberal ship is no longer sinking

By Jonathan Scott
Published: 2:08 pm, 20 October 2012
Modified: 4 pm, 20 October 2012
under
DAVEHUEHN/FLICKR
UPDATED

In last week’s issue of The Varsity, Carter West said Justin Trudeau has great hair and a great smile. It’s the only point his column gets right. He even goes so far as to say that Jack Layton — a man known as Smilin’ Jack — had a mouthful of gums and no dents: “It appears that [Trudeau’s] great contribution to the Liberal Party, aside from his storied name, are hair and teeth — two attributes Jack Layton lacked.”

It’s no secret Justin Trudeau has a great smile and a great head of hair. It’s also no secret the man is already the most written-about politician in Canada, so I’m going to keep this rebuttal column focused quite narrowly (a more wide-ranging assessment of Justin Trudeau’s candidacy, is available here).

The media cannot stop writing about Justin Trudeau. As Susan Delacourt explained, it’s because readers cannot stop reading about Trudeau. The man has an infectious personality. In person, he’s a larger-than-life celebrity. On social media, he’s an accessible, quirky open book.

I had the chance to fly to Montréal to hear Trudeau launch his leadership. He spoke about how we need a politician we not only trust, but someone we actually like.

Comparisons between anyone and Barack Obama are usually sloppy journalism, but in this case I think the point is apt. American voters are often said to have done more than vote for Obama in 2008. They fell in love with him, and Mitt Romney cannot campaign on his familiar territory of firing someone. He has to be more of a home-wrecker, breaking Americans up from their president; for most of the campaign, until Obama himself dropped the ball in the first debate, it seemed an impossible task. Likewise, those who love Justin Trudeau love him a lot — and like Obama, those who hate him because of his father do so apoplectically.

Great hair, a great smile and an engaging personality are not vices in politics, but they sure are uncommon. Stephen Harper and Thomas Mulcair have — by any objective metric — terrible hair, non-existent smiles and prickly personalities. From a simple PR perspective, Justin Trudeau is a winning contrast.

Is his résumé thin? It’s no worse than a one-term MP who had a few years as head of a right-wing lobbyist group before becoming leader of the Canadian Alliance. That man is of course our current prime minister.

Justin Trudeau was a teacher — significantly out west, where he has family and friendships — and a public speaker and advocate, mostly to and for youth. He is a winning Liberal candidate: along with Bonnie Crombie, one of only two Liberal seat gains elected in 2008 and the only Liberal MP to increase his margin of victory in 2011. And I’m not talking a small uptick in the vote. Against the Orange Wave that turned Québec politics on its head, Trudeau went from a slim two per cent win to a 10 per cent win.

In short, he’s a great, winning politician. Many Liberals, myself included, think it’s about time we try a great, winning politician, something we haven’t had at the helm since Jean Chrétien.

Justin Trudeau has established that he can win elections and engage the Canadian public like no other political figure in this country. The test now for Justin Trudeau is to answer the question: he can win, but can he govern? He can engage, but can he lead?

The next election hinges on the answer. But make no mistake, with Justin Trudeau at the helm, the Liberal ship is finally no longer sinking.

Jonathan Scott is president of the UofT Liberals and a contributor to The Globe and Mail.

  • http://himynameisAngelo.tumblr.com/ Angelo Mateo

    I would have included a mention to Lincoln as another “thin-resume” candidate. Going into the 1860 Presidential Race, he had two failed attempts at the Senate and one mediocre term as a Congressman.

    His rivals in the 1860 Republican Presidential Nomination Race included the likes of William Seward (former Governor of New York and U.S. Senator) and Salmon Chase (former Governor of Ohio and U.S. Senator).

    Just because a candidate doesn’t have much experience, it does not mean that their input will not be invaluable and that they might prove themselves during the race.

  • Jonathan Scott

    That’s a fair point, Angelo, except I don’t think an election fought by soap-box speeches and printing-press pamphleteering is really a useful comparison.

  • Anon

    I don’t understand. Are you just embracing the conclusion of the previous writer’s reductio? You’re saying – and, correct me if I’m wrong – that Trudeau is all hair and teeth, but that’s okay.

    • Jonathan Scott

      NO. I’m saying he’s much more than snide attacks, but also that a great, engaging personality and good looks certainly aren’t vices.

      • Anon

        “…much more…” = ????

        Everyone understands that politicians don’t win based purely on their qualifications; this isn’t really news. As I understand it, the fact that he was a teacher is enough for you?

        What others think is that although he might attract votes to the party, they’ll be for all the wrong reasons.

        • Jonathan Scott

          I don’t think environmentalism, youth issues, national unity and changing the way we do politics are “the wrong reasons”.

          • Anon

            Sure they are. Especially when they’re just vague platitudes. Also, is there any evidence for any of those things?

  • Anon

    Trudeau is french for ‘real money.’

  • Name

    Like most articles praising Trudeau, this one had no mention of anything Trudeau plans to do to improve the country or any contribution he’s made to any public debate on anything – only that he is good at winning elections.

    More proof that party insiders are looking for the easiest way back into power rather than coming up with original ideas that would make us want to put them in power. There is a difference.