Early last week, the federal Conservatives distributed fliers in predominantly Jewish ridings, accusing the Liberals of supporting Hezbollah—claims that, when examined, are clearly false.
The flier makes a number of assertions. The first is that the Liberal government “willingly participated in [the] overtly anti-Semitic Durban I [conference].” A diverse group of nations, including the European Union, the United States, and Israel attended the 2001 World Conference against Racism, named after the South African city in which it took place. The United States and Israel withdrew from the conference midway through in protest to wording in the drafts of the declaration that associated Zionism with racism, as well as text that referred to “holocausts” committed against non-Jewish cultural groups. It should be noted that references to Zionist racism were removed in the final text, and that the word “Holocaust” appears once in the declaration, used as a proper noun.
The Liberal presence was justified. Liberal MP Irwin Cotler, who attended the conference as part of the Canadian delegation, says that the Israeli delegation asked them to stay behind as observers. Even if this weren’t the case, to claim that Canada attended, and remained at the Durban conference because they supported anti-Semitism is simply ridiculous.
The flier’s second claim is that the Liberals “opposed defunding Hamas and asked that Hezbollah be delisted as a terrorist organization.” On the contrary, it was the Chrétien Liberal government that listed Hezbollah and Hamas as terrorist organizations in 2002. Even the social wing of Hezbollah, which foreign affairs minister Bill Graham initially resisted banning, was listed after reports that the organization’s leader had called for more suicide bombings.
The assertion that the current Liberal Party requested that Hezbollah be delisted seems to refer to Etobicoke Centre MP Borys Wrzesnewskyj’s 2006 fact-finding mission to Lebanon, after which he proposed reconsidering the ban on the social wing of Hezbollah, citing how integrated it was with Lebanese society, and expressing worries that denouncing and refusing all contact with every wing of the organization might inhibit negotiations. Although all signs indicate that Wrzesnewskyj’s comments were made in the interest of opening doors for a potential peace agreement, he later resigned from his post as deputy foreign affairs critic.
Lastly, the flier indicates that Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff “accused Israel of committing war crimes during the 2006 conflict [in Lebanon],” which unlike the first two claims, is completely true. In a 2006 interview, Ignatieff identified an Israeli air strike in Qana, Lebanon as a war crime. He later backed down, saying that Israel “may have failed to comply with the Geneva Convention of the laws of war,” which does not necessarily mean it committed war crimes.
Ignatieff is trying to avoid angering potential voters, and in that respect, his claim against Israel was unwise. But these allegations raise a bigger issue: why is stating that Israel has committed war crimes considered anti-Semitism?
In a later CTV segment, Tim Powers, a Conservative political strategist, said “I mean, we only had [last] October Omar Alghabra, the Liberal MP from Ontario, saying things that are somewhat in line with anti-Semitism, so it’s important to point this out.” Powers was referring to a blog post by the former Mississauga-Erindale MP in which he expressed support for the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, which was recently endorsed by the United Nations Human Rights Council. The findings called for an end to military hostility, saying that “we must always push to end violence and promote peaceful mediation that respects the rule of law.”
Agreeing with Judge Goldstone’s UN-backed report, which rightly accuses both sides of the conflict of war crimes, doesn’t constitute anti-Semitism, it indicates that Alghabra bases his judgements on reality, not on blind, immutable support of Israeli policy. The Conservative government’s conflation of anything but single-minded support for Israel with anti-Semitism is downright Orwellian, and should be insulting not just to Jewish Canadians, but to every taxpayer whose money was spent on these disgusting partisan attacks.











Comments
This is the lowest, and the scummiest act that I've ever seen carried out in Canadian politics.
There is no way that the Liberal Party, or anyone in it - is anti-Semitic. The Con Artists are trying to tar the Liberals with the same brush that they, the Reform Party, were tarred with justifiably. The Reform Party was full of people with let us say - sort of Thor's Hammer inclinations. They never got into power because of it, but they did take over the Conservative Party.
Now they're trying it on to see if they can bring the Liberal party down over the type of thing that the Reformers were actually guilty of. The fact that they'd try it shows their arrogance, thick-headedness, and viciousness.
Saying that someone is anti-Semitic because they don't agree with the Israeli government is diluting the term, so that under-50s don't understand what it means. Meanwhile, the real anti-Semites are just going to continue to grow. These people who follow Harper have no idea what a true anti-Semit is about - they are going to think it's just someone who doesn't like what Israel is doing. They don't realize that it is a racial hatred, where Jews are characterized as despicable untouchables - see Europe's history, history of the Jews in Europe.
If I were Jewish, I'd give the Con Artists a very wide berth. They're led by Evangelical Christians who are out of touch with reality, they condone torture and hand over victims, they have no compassion, and they're dishonest, and without conscience. The support for Israel from Harper is in order to gain votes, and get his Preciousss Majority. Once he's changed the country, you don't know what he's capable of.
Nov 23, 2009 at 11:13 AM
I am a Durbanite by birth. Irwin Cotler our champion in human rights stayed and must have observed race relations first hand even though South Africa has come along way from apartheid. He must have been extremely intrigued by 'race in South Africa' since it was institutionalised in the Constitution of the country. Many Jews were instrumental in collapsing apartheid - Ruth First and Joe Slovo and many others and this In any case Israel asked him to stay as observer. I visited South Africa and saw racism first hand all over again in 2005.
Nov 23, 2009 at 10:27 PM
Thank you Steven Harper,
Although my own values are closer to those of the Liberal party, for years, I have avoided voting for the Liberal Party of Canada because of Trudeau and Chretien's role in the sabotage of the Lake Meech Accord. It got Chretien his job as Prime Minister but in doing so, he nearly destroyed the country.
Although I have voted for M. Mulroney's conservatives who made the effort to bring Quebec into the constitution, since the failure of Meech i've voted sometimes for the Bloc, sometimes for the NDP.
The reformers and the Alliance from which this new Conservative party was born never struck me as being particularly trust worthy or honest and this latest pamphlet confirms it.
Chretien is retired, I'm voting Liberal next election !
Nov 25, 2009 at 12:27 PM
What I find humorous are all the comments by people who have obviously not seen the pamphlet.
It says nowhere that the Liberals are anti-semitic. It was the Liberals who put this spin on it. I'm not sure what they think they're going to gain by doing so.
Nov 25, 2009 at 11:18 PM
While I agree with you Grant that this kind of Tory agitprop is despicable, Oliver has a point when he says that it's the Liberals who've spun this as an "accusation of anti-semitism".
Instead of defending the positions they've taken (as you have done well in your article) the Liberals have actually helped to affirm the Conservative flyers by saying that they amount to accusations of anti-semitism. To critisize the policies of a state and to attack a racial or ethnic group are very, very different things and it's dangerous and destructive to progressive discourse to confuse or compound them.
Nov 27, 2009 at 02:48 PM
The flier is not one bit anti-semitic. How can they call it that? Just because they quoted someone for not supporting Israel makes it an accusatory flier? Politics as usual. This is why as a Liberal and a Jewish person I would never vote for the Liberal Party. I wouldn't vote for either.
Nov 28, 2009 at 04:22 AM
Post a Comment