UTSC students have voted to remove Zuhair Syed from his presidency of the Scarborough Campus Students’ Union, three months before the end of his contract.
Almost 10 per cent of students voted in the referendum amid fierce campaigning from both sides, with 554 for impeachment and 477 against. There were 14 abstentions and 34 spoiled votes.
The referendum was called after SCSU’s board of directors gave Syed a Tier 3 censure last December for “his inaction in representing the student interest as the President & CEO of the SCSU.” All of Syed’s presidential duties have been handed over to VP external Amir Bashir, the current acting president and CEO.

The board has yet to ratify the unofficial referendum result released on Saturday. The next scheduled board meeting is on Friday, Feb. 12. Since that date will be the last day of campaigning and voting for 2010-2011 executive elections—and a number of board members are running—there may not be quorum to hold a meeting.
Unless board members complain about illegitimacy in the voting process, the referendum results will be ratified, said humanities director Martine Lee. “I am glad the truth side won,” she said. “Not because I have anything personal against [Syed but because] students deserve justice.”
Syed could not be reached for comment.
“I am happy about [the referendum results] but it is a bitter-sweet kind of happiness. [Syed] was my frosh leader and I used to look up to him,” said Stephanie Fan, a third-year management student. “But he had an important position. You have to do your job and you can’t assume things will go unnoticed. People are watching you.”
“[The vote] just goes to show that democratic values are fundamental to people on campus,” said Julia Varshavska, who added that some campaigners were disrespectful to their opposition.
Syed’s supporters were disappointed. Second-year student Maryam Shah said she is “through with student government” after this referendum. “Zuhair was a great president. The allegations against him are just that: allegations,” she said, adding that she is boycotting the presidential election to take place this week.
Last month, Syed admitted to some of the allegations regarding his negligence of presidential duties, such as missing numerous SCSU board, academic committee, and governing council meetings. He also acknowledged his failure to submit reports to the board from August to December last year. He said he was busy opening up a new restaurant on campus and attending meetings regarding the Pan Am Games athletic facility in addition to taking on the duties of the VP campus life, who was absent due to illness.
Syed denied allegations accusing him of unavailability during his office hours, smoking shisha in the office, and threatening the VP academics after she joined a Facebook group advocating his impeachment. The board’s chair, who investigated the allegations, also said Syed tried to threaten him.
Syed’s presidential term was to end in May 2010.









Zuhair Syed



Comments
Your all fucking retarded. Spreading hateful lies to everyone making them believe the stupid shit people make up about Zuhair.
Congrats assholes. Now you lost a great president, someone who did so much for you all you ungrateful cock suckers.
Feb 8, 2010 at 03:35 PM
Hey Azim I think your rage is showing. You might want to stick it back inside (really isn't that pleasant to look at, let alone read).
Feb 8, 2010 at 06:32 PM
is this azim khan? the same punk ass who posted in the facebook group? the lame guy who makes those piss poor imitation music videos with his brother? the same brother who ran for scsu elections before but got disqualified?
looks like two apples dont fall far from each other.
Feb 8, 2010 at 07:09 PM
Let's try to keep this discussion civil, everyone. Our commenting policy is posted right above the Submit button.
Feb 8, 2010 at 08:54 PM
That's "you're all fucking retarded", genius.
Feb 8, 2010 at 09:30 PM
Rishi, why is it that you always have the best comments?
Feb 8, 2010 at 09:31 PM
Joe Howell, I find Azim's comment homophobic. Are we really allowed to call people "cock suckers"? I swear I did that last week and it got pulled.
Feb 8, 2010 at 10:28 PM
I fail to see how "cock sucker" can be construed as homophobic. Any straight male who thinks it is needs to have a talk with his significant other...
Feb 8, 2010 at 11:06 PM
french fry, not only was the context different, but you're a long-time poster who should know better.
Our CMS currently only allows us to keep or delete entire comments, so we're trying to be holistic about these things. Hopefully we'll be able to remove just part of a comment in the near future, and modding won't be such a heavy-handed exercise.
Feb 9, 2010 at 12:43 AM
Amir Bashir = CFS cleaning up SCSU for CFS friendly Exec's hence the internally created political debacle to rid SCSU of Syed who didn't cheapen and sell his soul to CFS - yea? Ridding of Syed, and replacement with Amir Bashir = hmmmm stronger membership for CFS...
Feb 9, 2010 at 11:42 AM
I haven't seen this comment that used the term cock-sucker, but it is indeed homophobic if it is applied to a male identified body. It's a term that is meant to imply shame, weakness and servitude of men who do such acts. It is clearly very homophobic. In terms of it being used to female identified people I would argue that it is also sexist for the same reasons.
I am also pretty insulted by the use of the term retard on this comment wall. I think some people at this university should really consider what they are typing before posting. No one will care to read or respect what you write until you learn to respect those who read your comments. This is not advocating people to be PC and to tolerate people, but to advocate actually listening and respecting people.
Welcome to the 21st century, get with it.
Feb 9, 2010 at 01:13 PM
Sorry, I just saw the comment that used cock-suckers was the same that used retard. It is very much homophobic and ableist.
I fail to see how the context is NOT homophobic and ableist
Feb 9, 2010 at 01:16 PM
No matter what side you are on, we are all human beings and we should respect each other. Although I am not a Varsity staff, I still believe that making this comment page into an insult war just defeats the whole purpose of why there is a comment wall underneath an article.
I think this article was well-written and we shall see after tonight what happens with the ratification. The SCSU board meeting is moved until 7pm tonight (usually starts at 5pm) to accommodate the board members who are still campaigning until 7pm for the 2010-2011 executive elections.
Feb 12, 2010 at 05:54 PM
Funny how according to Azim Khan's Facebook profile, he is a student from York University. Why would a York University student complain (or even care) about the UTSC impeachment when he can't even vote on it?
Feb 22, 2010 at 10:45 PM
Andrew Leung, shut UP. you're pathetic. If Azim wnats to support a UTSC students then he should have the freedom to do so. Don't be childish by infreanging on his support for Zuahir. GROW UP. I'm saddened U of T admits people like you. Someone needs to shed some student union history on you. UTSC and U of T as a whole has had and has a very strong and long relationship with universities like York and ryerson.. a relationship that extends since the 1970's. Their criticism( positive and negative), contributions and partnerships throughout the decades has been vital in shaping our student union.
Mar 4, 2010 at 04:13 PM
Andrew Leung, shut UP. you're pathetic. If Azim wnats to support a UTSC students then he should have the freedom to do so. Don't be childish by infringing on his support for Zuahir. GROW UP. I'm saddened U of T admits people like you. Someone needs to shed some student union history on you. UTSC and U of T as a whole has had a very strong and long relationship with universities such York and ryerson.. a relationship that extends back to the 1970's. Their criticism( positive and negative), contributions and partnerships throughout the decades have been vital in shaping our student union.
Mar 4, 2010 at 04:18 PM
The Varsity is not going to remove a comment that refers to a group of students as "retarded...cocksuckers"? Or a post about how another poster should "shut up" and is "pathetic"? Seriously?
Do Varsity staff not care at all about their own commenting guidelines? Or are they just not paying attention?
PS - I don't care at all about what ends up happening with the impeachment proceedings.
Mar 9, 2010 at 09:02 PM
Post a Comment