On October 25, Torontonians will cast their ballots to elect a new mayor. In the midst of debate about fiscal responsibility and the future of public services, student issues have largely remained invisible. This may be the result of provincial governments in Canada having responsibility for post-secondary education and health coverage, which directly impact post-secondary students. A municipality like Toronto has more of an indirect impact with its responsibility for public transportation and environmental sustainability – two issues that students have been particularly vocal about. An analysis of the mayoral candidates and their stance on these municipal responsibilities is required to show how students will be impacted by the results of the election.
Thus far, the debate over public transit has been receiving the bulk of the media’s attention. The central questions – how to keep operating costs low, whether or not to expand, and how to pay for expansion – remain the same as in years past, though candidates this time around have to consider all of that in light of an increasingly fractured city budget.

Rocco Rossi offers a bold strategy for the TTC with “Transit City Plus.” His plan of “continuous tunnelling” is intended to sidestep start-stop construction costs and provide for significant expansion. The cost of such a venture – which Rossi wants to pay for through the privatization of city services like Toronto Hydro – is high, and virtually impossible without a significant reduction in the city’s debt. His plan also lacks details about the locations of the proposed expansion. His counterpart at the forefront of the race, George Smitherman, is offering a more comprehensive, 10-year transit strategy that includes maps for light-rail transportation, expanding bike lanes, and extending subway lines east of Kennedy station.
Where Rossi’s transit plan seems to ignore commuter students, Smitherman’s strategy includes an offer to have LRT service post-secondary campuses yet to be reached by TTC subways, like Humber College in the west end and UTSC and Centennial College in the east. Veteran city councillor and Deputy Mayor Joe Pantalone is championing incumbent David Miller’s Transit City plans, which includes cautious subway expansion and the addition of LRT services connecting Pearson airport with Kennedy station.
In his environment platform George Smitherman has highlighted that 30,000 tonnes of recyclable material still heads to the Green Lane landfill site near London, Ontario. He plans to bring RecycleBank to Toronto, an organization that assigns loyalty points to good recyclers, which can then be used to shop for goods at local businesses. Rocco Rossi has pushed for closing bike lanes on arterial roadways and to halt existing plans to build new ones. Additionally Rossi, along with Rob Ford, have pushed for privatizing garbage collection services. Both Rossi and Ford seem to forget that in 2007 the city council voted in favour of replacing York Region’s privatized garbage collection with unionized workers, saving York Region $4 million a year. Pantalone’s platform consists in continuing the Tree Planting Advocacy Program he started in 2000. He claims that it has lead to over 500,000 trees being planted since its inception. Smitherman’s platform may be a boon for environmentally-conscious post-secondary students who could use the loyalty points to pay for much needed groceries. Rossi’s bike lane proposal would be harmful to those students who use cycling as means of healthy, inexpensive transport.
Rossi and Ford’s planned privatization of garbage disposal is short-sighted. A private collection company would not venture far past its mandate to examine a less wasteful means of disposal. Smitherman plans to hire a technical advisor to look at sustainable methods of disposal that could save the city millions of dollars. Pantalone, the current chair of the city’s Roundtable on the Environment, is still keeping the status quo with his tree-planting program. While it’s a good program, Smitherman is more ambitious with his plan to add fifteen more parks to the city. This may be a plus for environmentally conscious students, though the same students could take issue with his plan to add twelve more showers to the Toronto beaches, a project that could prove quite wasteful.
Overall, George Smitherman has the most fleshed out platform in response to issues such as public transportation and environmental sustainability. This may give Smitherman an advantage in appealing to the concerns of post-secondary students. However, he still has not directly addressed the issue of token prices or just how many bike lanes he would like to see in the city. Rossi’s and Ford’s platforms will not be popular among post-secondary students and may even prove to be detrimental to securing any of their votes. Pantalone offers an agenda that stays the course, but may not be ambitious enough to spark the imaginations of young voters. The race is far from over, but the mayoral candidates are still struggling to define themselves in the minds of student voters.









There's no fighting it - a new mayor for the City of Toronto will be elected on October 25. Photo by David Pike


Comments
I think Rossi needs to take a trip to Montreal or New York, where safe and beautiful bike lanes have been built right through downtown on streets like Broadway Avenue.
Or he could just stick to courting the head-in-sand demographic.
Jul 6, 2010 at 04:51 AM
Bears mentioning that the Globe and Mail has called Smitherman's transit plan "reckless and irresponsible" while the Sun has called it a "recipe to bankrupt the city". Not exactly inspiring if you ask me.
As for the bikelane issue; Smitherman is calling for a HALT to all bikelane expansion whereas Rossi is calling for expansion on secondary routes only. So Smitherman is hardly a proponent of bikelanes...
Jul 6, 2010 at 12:01 PM
I really think you need to fact check your articles before posting them. Allow me to point out where you are wrong:
"Rocco Rossi has pushed for closing bike lanes on arterial roadways and to halt existing plans to build new ones."
Rossi has never pushed for closing existing bike lanes. He has only called for existing plans on Jarvis and University to be halted until the new council is in place.
He is also most outspoken about his commitment to expand the bike network
See: http://roccorossi.com/releases/statement-opposing-bike-lanes-on-university-avenue/
You say that Rossi's transit plan is virtually impossible to pay for without removing city debt -- yet you do not mention that Smitherman's plan costs $7B more than Rossi's. Why not mention that it is also only possible for Smitherman's plan to come to fruition if we reduce our debt?
You say Rossi's transit plan is not comprehensive and "ignores commuter students".
Rossi's plan includes building out St. Clair west stubway to Scarborough Town Centre, building a downtown relief line, futureproofing existing plans such as Eglinton LRT tunnels for subways down the road, increased busses in the suburbs, partnering with regional transit providers like Go, and introducing regional payment systems like 'Presto'.
How is that NOT with the commuter student in mind?
See: http://roccorossi.com/speeches/speech-to-supporters-at-an-evening-with-rocco-rossi-dinner-fundraiser/
Did you know that the things we put in our recycling bins still end up in landfills? We don't need to incentivize recycling. We need to come up with a comprehensive solution for dealing with waste in general. You are wrong to infer that private garbage services will "not venture far past its mandate to examine a less wasteful means of disposal". Let me explain how contracting works: We tell them what we want them to do and they do it.
Perhaps you should read the other candidates' platforms before deciding that Smitherman's is the most "fleshed out".
It seems to me that for students trying to influence students you really didn't do your homework.
Jul 6, 2010 at 01:27 PM
The comments above should not include the numbers (error in your commenting system I suppose?).
Jul 6, 2010 at 01:28 PM
I'm curious to know which one of the authors/editors is involved in the Smitherman campaign.
What a wonderfully biased article. I was unaware that the varsity so blatantly supported Smitherman.
You seem to have forgotten the fact that Smitherman's transit plan asks the private sector to finance $7 billion of his plan, with Toronto eventually repaying it.
Smitherman's transit plan, while comprehensive, is a recipe to place our generation into debt. With the city already owing $3billion dollars, this is unacceptable.
Perhaps the varsity writers should stop taking their facts directly from Smitherman's website?
Jul 6, 2010 at 01:51 PM
Michael,
Rocco Rossi has advocated for the review and removal of bike lanes on arterial roadways. In his own words: "common sense and safety tell me bike lanes and arterial roads don't mix."
And yes we did do our homework. Just because Abdi and I have drawn conclusions you might disagree with (your criticisms are mostly matters of value rather than matters of fact) does not mean we were sloppy in our research. To me your criticism reads more like: "This article did not confirm my own beliefs about the mayoral race, so therefore it must be wrong." Clearly, you're a Rossi supporter who didn't like the assessment of your favoured candidate's platform.
Quite frankly, we don't like Rossi's platform. We're not even really big fans of Smitherman's, but after looking at what other candidates had to offer, his is the most fleshed out. More fleshed out does not necessarily mean better. From an objective point of view his transit and environmental goals are better defined and more beneficial to post-secondary students.
You're completely free to disagree with us. Just don't accuse of being sloppy and incoherent.
Jul 6, 2010 at 02:06 PM
Phil,
Once again, our article is not an endorsement of the Smitherman campaign. We just thought that Smitherman has been able to define himself better than his opponents. Now that could easily change before October 25.
Also, this is the comment section. Writers are free to be as biased and one-sided as they want to be.
Jul 6, 2010 at 02:09 PM
I am a Rossi supporter and have no problem whether this is a pro-Smitherman piece.
For the sake of YOUR journalistic integrity I am simply encouraging you to fact check.
It is fine that you have drawn conclusions I don't agree with, but don't tout an "objective point of view" after asserting that you "quite frankly" don't like Rossi's platform.
Jul 6, 2010 at 02:17 PM
Ok, I was stretching it when I said objective point of view, but I think my point still stands that you shouldn't be accusing us (as you have again) of lacking "journalistic integrity" when we just might have an interpretation that differs from your own. Once again, this is the comment section.
Jul 6, 2010 at 02:27 PM
"Ok, I was stretching it when I said objective point of view, but I think my point still stands..."
I love the smell of doublespeak in the afternoon.
Jul 6, 2010 at 02:45 PM
Michael, have you heard Rossi's speech at the Empire club from months back?
He said as mayor he would oppose bike lanes on arterial roads, whether it be Queen street, Jarvis, Finch, or Eglinton. Because "common sense and safety" and all that nonsense.
Rossi knows it is literally impossible to get around using only side streets. So does anybody who has tried to bike in Toronto.
One of the busiest streets in the city for cyclists is Queen Street West. Please, tell me what parallel side street makes a good alternative to Queen Street?
Jul 6, 2010 at 08:10 PM
No candidate has a satisfactory transit platform. Smitherman and Rossi are peddling unfunded pie-in-the-sky proposals more suited to a provincial election campaign, and Ford... well I wouldn't go so far as to refer to his ideas as a "plan".
As for bike lanes, we should continue building them. We should also start policing cycling just as heavily as we police the mode of transit it's supposed to be an alternative to (driving). Once we start issuing $400 tickets to every cyclist who violates a controlled intersection, we'll have all the money we need to build another subway.
Jul 6, 2010 at 08:58 PM
Luke, why do you think more bike lanes are needed on Jarvis, when there are bike lanes already on Sherbourne right next door? Are you not worried about the added gridlock of removing a lane from that corridor? Do motorists not count at all in this debate?
Jul 6, 2010 at 09:51 PM
Hi Victoria.
You are correct, Jarvis does not need a bike lane, and I agree on that.
But Rocco was adamant that NO arterial roads would have a bike lane, which is pure nonsense.
What is the side-street alternative to Queen West? There is none. Bloor Street? Nope, all the alternatives are dead-ended and don't even cross the Don Valley.
I sympathize with motorists, but they need to realize that every person who switches from car to bike means LESS gridlock traffic on the streets, freeing it up for them and their car.
What is the number one reason potential cyclists drive instead of bike? Safety. Fix the safety problem, and everybody wins.
Jul 6, 2010 at 11:50 PM
Luke- im curious to know why you think a line of paint drawn on a street is a guarantee of safety?
And alex, im not sure there was ever any question of whether or not this piece was objective.
Jul 7, 2010 at 12:15 AM
Hi Phil.
I don't consider a painted line to be the safest form of bike infrastructure, but even just a painted bike lane has a noticeable effect on converting commuters to bikes.
Have a look at what was built in Montreal a couple years ago:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3646/3594148731_4902edee7d.jpg
You can send your grandma on that thing, right through downtown and not worry for her safety.
If Montreal can do it, why not Toronto?
Jul 7, 2010 at 02:05 AM
@Luke
"You are correct, Jarvis does not need a bike lane, and I agree on that."
With that simple statement, you have already shown more journalistic insight than the authors of this shamelessly one-sided, ill-researched Varsity article. (sorry Alex, me thinks you doth protest too much about your rights to "opinion" in the comments section. My head is still spinning)
Luke, your other points are noteworthy, and I appreciate that you are not dismissing that we motorists count for something. Perhaps there is a compromise to be made somewhere, but it's not going to be on Jarvis, since no reasonable person can believe that makes any sense at all.
Thanks.
Jul 7, 2010 at 07:48 AM
As a U of T student, I have no clue where you're getting your opinions from...
I care about money. And so do all of my friends, and other students that I talk to. We care about the reckless spending going on down at City Hall. We care about the non-stop new taxes we're seeing all the time, and the more and more that our municipal government is taking from our already empty pockets.
We're not interested in another eHealth fiasco here in Toronto. We can't afford it!!
George Smitherman would be the biggest mistake that Toronto could make. I'm voting for Rob Ford. He will fix Toronto and make it more affordable for us to live here. And believe me, I'm not the only one who feels that way.
Jul 8, 2010 at 01:30 AM
Fantastic article!
To hear from the mayoral candidates directly, please put September 2nd from 6pm-8:30pm in your schedule. There is a mayoral debate that evening that is focused on youth issues.
I'm in a program called CITY Leaders, a leadership development institute sponsored by the United Way & U of T Faculty of Social Work. Our project team is hosting Toronto's Youth Priority Symposium, a mayoral debate that will create a dialogue between the candidates and youth.
We have confirmed attendance from all the leading candidates, and we will also be inviting a few of the fringe candidates, based on their youth platforms. Event location TBA- most likely City Hall's Council Chamber.
For more information, visit our website or email typsinfo@gmail.com
Jul 9, 2010 at 08:15 AM
Here is a link to the mayoral debate on youth issues event website: http://typs.wordpress.com/
It is still a bit under construction- a facebook page will also be up soon.
Jul 9, 2010 at 08:17 AM
Post a Comment