The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health is in court today and may have to pay four and a half million dollars in fines.The centre has been charged with violating the Occupational Health and Safety Act for failing to make their work environment safer. In total, there were nine charges laid by the Ontario Ministry of Labour for failure to develop and implement violence-prevention procedures, as well as failure to protect workers.If convicted, CAMH may be fined up to $500,000 per offence.CAMH was ordered to improve workplace safety after two violent incidents occurred last year.On November 12, 2007, a patient jumped over a Dutch door (which splits in half horizontally), entered a nursing station and attacked two female nurses, leaving one with a broken shoulder.Five days later, a patient entered a nursing station and broke a male nurse’s jaw. Security staff didn’t have keys and a panic button was not working.The Ontario Nurses’ Association, which represents 569 registered nurses at CAMH, claims violence at CAMH continued, with 23 attacks before the year’s end.“In ONA’s opinion, not enough is being done to keep nurses safe on the job,” said ONA president Linda Haslam-Stroud.U of T runs several research, clinical, and outreach partnerships with CAMH. U of T’s department of Psychology works closely with the cetre, often running programs out of CAMH.The incidents have sparked controversy and debate about mental health issues.Last month, the Ontario Public Service Employees Union, representing non-nursing staff at CAMH, commenced a campaign of bus shelter ads. The ads, which have since been removed after complaints that it stigmatized patients, featured a woman with a bruised eye and the text: “No more excuses. The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health must protect its staff from violence. It’s the law.”“Hospital workers deserve no less than a safe job environment,” OPSEU president Smokey Thomas said in a statement. “I don’t regret for a moment that ads were placed.”“Nurses do face workplace hazards more serious than in many other professions,” said Haslam-Stroud, pointing to a CBC investigation which found nurses more likely to be assaulted and injured on the job than police officers and firefighters.Eric Preston, vice-president of human resources at CAMH, told the media that CAMH had implemented a workplace violence prevention strategy and trained staff in time for a deadline this February.“We have a lot of processes and training in place to make things as safe as possible,” Preston told the CBC. “Can we do better? Certainly. Can we do more? Definitely. Will we be doing more? Absolutely.”ONA told The Varsity that although CAMH does have a violence prevention policy, it lacks such a program. This would entail in-depth risk assessments, routine equipment assessments and training staff.While the ONA applauded the charges laid by the Ontario Ministry of Labour, many are critical of the charges which, if implemented, will affect an agency that funds research on mental health issues. Others wonder how much potential charges may affect funding for security and safety programs.
CAMH facing workplace safety charges
Following a hearty holiday dinner, many find themselves satiated, lethargic, and a little tight in the waistband. Nevertheless, this doesn’t stop us from devouring a generous serving of apple pie, or downing a glass of creamy eggnog. Despite having stuffed yourself to the limit, why is there always room for dessert?Ghrelin, a hormone in the stomach responsible for stimulating appetite, is partly accountable. Hungry or not, ghrelin causes the brain to be more receptive to visual cues, such as appealing desserts. The brain responds and relays the sensation back to the stomach, often translating to the signal that stimulates appetite. For people with a sweet tooth, this craving is hard to resist.Dr. Jay Gottfried of University College London conducted a study of the neurological impact of “selective satiation,” or what he prefers to call “the restaurant phenomenon.” MRIs were performed on 13 volunteers and live brain activity was studied in response to different stimuli. Volunteers were shown computer images while the sweet aromas of ice cream, vanilla, or peanut butter wafted past them.“At various points before, during, and after scanning we asked them to give us pleasantness ratings for the smells,” said Gottfried. “Unconsciously, the volunteers began to associate the images with the smells.” The images that appeared when a pleasant aroma was present received higher ratings. When the volunteers ate the ice cream or peanut butter, brain images showed a strong emotional response. Additionally, the impact of the olfactory stimulus was weakened. “A person’s response to the peanut butter odour changed after eating some peanut butter, but a vanilla smell made the brain light up again. Eventually, the abstract picture associated with vanilla evoked the responses, but again they weakened after the volunteers ate,” explained Gottfried.The study found that the amygdala—the area of the brain that processes emotions—and the orbitofrontal cortex were stimulated in response to the sweet aromas. Damage to either of these regions could cause Kluver-Bucy syndrome, whereby patients consume large amounts of food or attempt to eat non-food items. Abnormalities in these regions are speculated to have a role in over-eating disorders.Another study conducted at Queen’s University suggests a somewhat bizarre alternative. William Ruddock and his colleagues investigated the hypothesis of an accessory dessert pouch either in, or attached to the stomach. While this pouch would not be localized in any anatomical record, Ruddock and his colleagues used a dessert-like substance termed chocoglucofructogalactomaltolactosucrografin (or Fudge-o-grafin) in an attempt to visualize it. Study subjects were winners of pie-eating contests who claimed to always have room for dessert. The results showed that there was a hollow out-pouching from the antrum of the stomach, ranging from 150 to 1600 mL in size, which they called the “Pot de Crème.”
It’s been a long day. Your feet are killing you and winter is setting in. You’re not sure where you’ll sleep tonight, or when your next meal will be. You’re tired of relying on acquaintances for favors. You’d rather be able to go home like anyone else. Most kids might wish for an ipod this Christmas, but all you want is a pair of clean socks. Last night’s shelter wasn’t as friendly as you had imagined. How long will this go on?For youth on the streets, survival is an art. It requires resilience, creativity, and luck. Becoming homeless isn’t an easy choice—sometimes it’s not even a choice. Many young people won’t, or can’t go home due to an abusive or absent family. Yet the longer they stay on the streets, the harder it is to leave.Mental illness is not uncommon. Whether the cause of their original flight or an outcome of the stresses of street life, depression and substance abuse are widespread. St. Michael’s Hospital psychiatrist Dr. John Langley specializes in homeless youth. He estimates that five to 15 per cent suffer from severe mental illness. Since most psychiatrists for children treat patients up 16 years of age, and psychiatrists for adults will normally treat those 25 and up, few practitioners are trained to treat youth between the ages of 16 and 24. This significant gap is an important transition time for many young people, when it is easy to feel vulnerable. Perhaps more significant, It is also the onset period for some severe mental illnesses like bipolar disorder.According to Langley, of the approximately 32,000 individuals who used homeless shelters in 2002, 6,000 to 7,000 were youth. These statistics don’t include the young people living under the proverbial bridge. There are 12 youth shelters in Toronto, ranging from the less restrictive YMCA to the structured, long-term Covenant House. Beyond basic services, programs directed at homeless and at-risk youth aim towards job training and continuing education. Phoenix Print Shop provides accommodation as well as training in the printing business, giving youth the skills and confidence to pursue work later on.Toronto United Way President Frances Lankin praisesd these initiatives for their “holistic” approach. “All of them are focused on kids who are struggling in their life, and for whom the traditional mainstream institutions of secondary school and regular employment centres are failing them. There’s more challenges in their life, and more supports that they require,” she said.Rudy Ruttiman, Executive Director of SKETCH, also finds institutional systems limiting. “We have built services and systems and schools on the lack in people […] as opposed to the asset-based [approach],” she said. SKETCH is a Toronto-based arts initiative, providing drop-in studio hours, art supplies, and lunch to at-risk youth. SKETCH staff help participants turn inborn talents into real-life skills, creating opportunities for jobs and further education. Work from SKETCH artists has been featured in galleries across the city. Founded 1996 by Phyllis Novak, the initiative began as a workshop for women battling drug addiction. One of SKETCH’s first culture-makers is now earning her PhD.“Because of what they’ve been through, whatever led them to making the decision to live homeless, means they’re quite resilient, they know how to get by on very little,” said Ruttiman. “We know they’ve got a lot to offer, we know they’re incredibly creative.”Many ignore the potential of young people categorized as homeless, seeing them as more of a nuisance than an asset to the community. The stigma surrounding life on the street is a limiting factor for youth looking to reorient their lives. “When we see someone on the street, we automatically make decisions about who they are,” says Ruttiman. “The myth is that they’re choosy and they’re lazy and they don’t want to get a job.”“When we work with people in the community, we find people who really want a normal life,” Lankin added. Building skills and confidence in the arts is one way SKETCH starts its participants on a path to greater stability and self-sufficiency. Originally from Lima, Peru, Rosa (last name withheld) came to Canada eight years ago. Now 25, she has studied fashion design at the Toronto Institute of the Arts, learning silkscreening, collage, and installation through SKETCH. She hopes to start an online business in secondhand clothing designs and accesssories. Before entering the program, Rosa says she felt rejected by mainstream employers because of her unusual appearance. “People shouldn’t judge by the way you look, just how you act and relate to other people,” she said.For youth still struggling, the solution doesn’t come easy. Langley points out that the major gap in care is a lack of long-term youth addiction treatment centres. No such programs exist in Toronto, and addiction centres throughout Ontario have waiting lists of up to six months. Ruttiman points to a need for preventative and rehabilitative care. “They’re doing the only thing they know how to do in those big infrastructures. They’ll put a band aid on it […] but it doesn’t stop the root of the problem.” Lankin argues that a lack of affordable housing perpetuates the problem.SKETCH was one of the arts programs threatened by the Conservative government’s proposed funding cuts. Homelessness affects 300,000 Canadians of all age groups, a statistic that prompted the Toronto Disaster Relief Committee to declare homelessness a “national disaster” a decade ago. Creative initiatives offer new approaches to community development and rehabilitation. When asked about her solution, Rosa’s answer is simple: “Support the arts!”
Top researchers are developing hockey helmets to better protect players from concussions
The image of a dazed and confused hockey player carried off the ice on a stretcher may soon be a thing of the past.Researchers from the University of Ottawa’s Neurotrauma Impact Laboratory have developed an ice hockey helmet testing system that measures the level of angular acceleration—or rotation—of the head during a concussion.Blaine Hoshizaki, director of the lab and chair of the International Standard Committee, which deals primarily with certification standards of hockey helmets and facial protection, says historical research points to angular acceleration of the head as a predictor of concussion.He’s optimistic that once helmets are designed to manage angular acceleration, the amount of concussions in hockey will decrease.“Then there will probably be standards that require a certain level of angular acceleration management by the helmet,” said Hoshizaki.In the next five years, he envisions the engineering of more complex and sophisticated energy absorbing structures by Nike and Reebok, the two biggest hockey equipment manufacturers.“They both have very sophisticated development labs. I put them in so I should know,” said Hoshizaki. “That’s the nice thing […] once you develop these tools for [the manufacturers], they will put them into play very quickly.”World renowned injury prevention specialist Pat Bishop has spent nearly 40 years serving on various Canadian Standards Association (CSA) technical committees. With projects that include the evaluation of head protection in hockey, Bishop thinks changing the system of padding in the helmets could be a useful suggestion.Bishop says this may reduce the magnitude of the impact force, which in turn reduces the vector component of the rotational force.“The question then becomes, what’s the padding?” said Bishop. “How thick does it have to be, how massive does it have to be? Those questions are trying to be addressed by some people.”Ryan Ouckama, a PhD student at McGill University, is trying to improve the protection of hockey helmets by investigating their local pressure distribution. Ouckama launched hockey pucks on to the sides of helmets and measured the corresponding acceleration of the head form in the helmet.What he found was that even relatively low accelerations had pressures capable of causing bone fracture in the skull.“You sort of had contradicting measures: you had acceleration measures saying it was well below these current standards of what’s considered a dangerous impact, yet it was still obviously dangerous to possible [hockey players] that could be wearing it because of these relatively high pressures,” said Ouckama.Elbows, punches, sticks, and shoulders to the head are just some of the instances that can lead to angular acceleration of the head in hockey.Picture a hook punch to the jaw in boxing, which causes the head to rotate on two planes: coronal (head moving up or down) and sagittal (head moving left or right). When this happens, rotation of both the brain and brain tissues occurs, disrupting its nerve axons and causing concussion.Currently, the predominant North American system for testing helmets measures only linear acceleration during impact.This testing involves a guillotine-like apparatus in which a sculptured head wearing a helmet is guided from a defined height on to a flat rigid surface. When traveling down, the helmeted head form moves in a straight line, prevented from rotating.Once it strikes the ground, it quickly decelerates from its impact velocity to zero. This deceleration is taken as the linear acceleration.The numbers that come out of helmet testing through linear acceleration determine whether or not a helmet, under current standards, is safe.“And by safe we mean that it’s not going to produce things like skull fractures and brain bleeds,” said Bishop.He agrees with Hoshizaki that angular acceleration appears to be the culprit in causing concussions. Designing a helmet that reduces it may lead to fewer concussions.But Bishop still remains skeptical.“It’s a challenge. If it can be done effectively, it is a step in the right direction,” said Bishop. “I’m not sure myself if it can be done. But they said you couldn’t put a man on the moon either. Never say never.”The big problem, according to Hoshizaki, is that the industry doesn’t usually invest in research that tries to improve on equipment safety standards.“It’s up to us at the universities to undertake it and make sure these standards becomes safer and [in this case] result in safe helmets.”
Survival of the cutest
Being unattractive can lead to unhealthy sexual practices in urban gay males, according to a recent study by U of T sociology professor Adam Isaiah Green.The study, entitled “Health and Sexual Status in an Urban Gay Enclave: An Application of the Stress Process Model” and published in the Journal of Health and Social Behavior, is the product of three years of observation and interviews in a gay community he calls “the Village.” For many of its members, sexuality and social life are intertwined.Green outlines factors that contribute to a gay male’s unattractiveness, specifically age, ethnicity, physical fitness, and social class. These factors, he argues, influence one’s “desirability.” He outlines a Village status structure that favours young, fit Caucasians of a higher social class.“For instance a man over 50 can have a really hard time in the urban gay downtown, and Asian men report they’re marginalized in the status structure,” Prof. Green said.Less desirable males can suffer from depression or substance abuse as a result of repeated rejection in the “sexual marketplace.” The most sobering conclusion Green draws is that less desirable men can sometimes engage in unsafe sex to compensate for their undesirability factors.Those doing gay social work, he said, need to start considering sexual attractiveness as part of an individual’s sense of community. He also noted that further research may show similar patterns in heterosexual or lesbian cultures, although other factors need to be considered such as material wealth.Green has amassed a large collection of posters, magazines, and flyers from the Village, some of which he showed The Varsity. Every image was of young, fit, white models.For gay males who don’t meet this criteria, “it communicates an erotic ideal that they don’t fit into and indeed what they’ll find [is] they have much less control over who approaches them or their ability to seek out a desired partner.”“It’s a feeling of disempowerment and of marginality and in some cases it can be quite consistent and quite severe.”
Guns N’ Roses rock to excess
The long-awaited and nearly mythical Chinese Democracy has finally arrived, and Axl Rose is nowhere to be found.It’s been reported that the Guns N’ Roses front man (and tortured genius or egomaniacal buffoon, take your pick) has been missing for two months on the eve of the release of his magnum opus. It’s been 14 years in the making, and the man just can’t step forward and take credit for the finished product.It’s a fitting conclusion to rock’s most infamous ordeal.With the album on the shelves, the public has been left in an oddly familiar situation—just like the last decade and a half, we’re wondering where Axl is, how he’s doing, and what exactly he’s thinking.I wasn’t even a huge Guns N’ Roses fan growing up, but like many others, I’ve been anticipating this album ever since I first heard about it. I longed to experience the purported masterpiece in the making that tortured its creator, principally because there’s nothing I love more than a sweeping epic. My favourite pieces of art are usually those that astonish and take my breath away. While I’m normally a huge supporter of ambition, Axl Rose’s Chinese Democracy was simply too much for me to handle. To my dismay, the album I had waited for turned out to be so overwhelming and loaded with frills that I felt physically tired and a even little queasy by the time it was over.To me, Chinese Democracy proves one thing beyond a shadow of a doubt: excess is the opposite of the rock n’ roll spirit.After the millions of dollars wasted on the making of this album, it’s easy to forget that Guns N’ Roses came from nothing, sleeping together in the same filthy one bedroom apartment as they crafted their classic 1987 album Appetite for Destruction.20 years later, the excessive funding and massive ambition Appetite spawned has led us to Chinese Democracy, a sprawling 71-minute mess of wailing solos, orchestral flourishes, and multiple bridges stacked one on top of the next.It’s the sonic equivalent of a rich, bloated Elvis Presley being undone by the endless number of fried peanut butter and banana sandwiches he could finally afford. It’s musical gluttony—so epic it makes Oasis’ Be Here Now (another famous crime of excess) sound like it was recorded overnight in a garbage can.And that’s precisely the problem—there’s so much of everything that nothing in particular gets the chance to stand out.The saddest part of it all is that the minute details (the ones that Rose obsessed over) are mere filler, obscuring the melodies that are best at their most simple. Rose should have trusted his instincts and let his considerable songwriting talent speak for itself.The album’s most promising moments, like the sneering title track, the towering chorus of “Shackler’s Revenge,” and the stunning power ballads “Catcher In the Rye” and “Street of Dreams” are weighed down by needless arrangements and interludes.By the time each five-minute epic concludes, you’ve completely forgotten the part of the song you wanted to hum.Along the way, Axl employs many different voices, most of which are so shockingly incongruous (no surprise, given that it took 14 years to produce 14 tracks) that the album often resembles a compilation. There’s the familiar screeching menace (“I.R.S.”), the off-Broadway leading man (“This I Love”), and even a brief and confusing Count Dracula impersonation (“Sorry”).And that’s ignoring the songs that just plain suck (“If the World,” “Scraped,” “Riad N’ the Bedouins”).But the sheer amount of incredible solos and brilliant melodies make it clear that Axl Rose slaved over this album, and he deserves to be commended for it. In a way, I’m strangely proud of him. But the bad decisions far outweigh the good ones.One lyric from “Better” sums up the entire Chinese Democracy ordeal: “The melody inside of me still searches for solution.”No matter how long he worked on it, no matter that it’s now sitting on the shelves—in Axl’s mind, the album is never really done. Maybe that’s why he can’t face up to the current barrage of both positive and negative criticism. Axl’s right back where he spent the last 14 years—alone, hiding out.In the end, Chinese Democracy is the sound of one man doing everything he can to produce something perfect, battling all of his natural instincts along the way. The result is disappointing, because the final product turned out to be simply too much of a good thing—too much of everything.
Hip for the Holidays
Every year, local romantics Stars give their Toronto fans something to swoon about with a series of winter shows. For three nights in a row this month, they’ll bring their romantically-charged chamber pop to the Queen Elizabeth Theatre. December 11-13. $31.50 at Ticketmaster, Rotate This, Soundscapes.
Heaven & Hell Package (Handel’s Messiah and Jerry Springer The Opera)
You love spiritual elevation and high culture, but when trashy talk shows come on television, you just can’t seem to resist. The Heaven & Hell package affirms your varied tastes, offering discounted tickets on two very different shows. Handel’s Messiah is a soaring oratorio and a holiday classic. Jerry Springer, meanwhile, comes with a warning of “extremely coarse language and adult situations”. If you can handle both shows, save 10 per cent on each. Messiah is Friday, December 12, at 7:30 p.m. at Knox College Chapel (59 St. George), and Jerry Springer The Opera runs January 16-31 at Hart House. $27 both for shows.
Newmindspace Full Moon Gathering
With Newmindspace co-founder Kevin Bracken graduating and moving to New York, Toronto’s famed public space invaders are holding a mass brainstorming session designed to keep the dream alive. While Bracken’s had a hell of a run, it’s time for us locals to grab the torch. December 12, Raw Space (221 Sterling Ave.)
Loving In The Name Of (One-Year Anniversary)
With live Lionel Ritchie covers by a band starring Sebastian Grainger and Josh Reichmann, and inspired choreography by Alison Peacock, Toronto’s least annoying dance party celebrates its first birthday with a soiree at Lee’s. They promise good tunes, good vibes, and most importantly, celebrity appearances. (Sook-Yin Lee is a known attendee.) December 13th, 2008, 10 p.m., Lee’s Palace (529 Bloor West), $5
Housepaint at the ROM
Open to the public, the ROM’s exhibit of graffiti art is the first to be held in a major Canadian museum. The street art will showcase urban social issues and the pieces will be auctioned off next summer. Opening December 13.
You’re never too old to enjoy Macaulay Caulkin’s crazy hijinks as he attempts to outsmart Danny Elfman and Joe Pesci. Bring arts editor Rob Duffy as your date and you will score major Varsity bonus points. December 17, Bloor Cinema, 7p.m.
It’s a Wonderful Life
If there was ever a Christmas movie that could get past shallow materialism, this is it. Frank Capra’s 1946 classic has do-gooder George Bailey (James Stewart) wishing he had never been born. Guardian angel (Henry Travers) is sent to show Bailey how much he has improved his community and will inspire you to do the same. December 19, Bloor Cinema, 7 p.m., free for members.
It’s not New Year’s Eve without Toronto’s alt-country heroes The Sadies. If past years are any indication, special guests are bound to show up and help them ring in 2009. Make sure to get to the Horseshoe early to beat the crowd. December 31, 9p.m. $20 at Ticketmaster, Rotate This, Soundscapes.
Shit La Merde at Sneaky Dee’s
DJ Shit La Merde’s monthly Friday sets at Sneaky Dee’s are always packed with electro-loving hipsters and surprise special guests. If your ideal New Year’s involves sweating to LCD Soundsystem and 90s hip-hop in a grunge-tastic bar, this one’s for you. December 31, 10 p.m., $10 advance, $20 door
Editorial: What a term it was
This was quite the semester to be a student editor (i.e. an overworked nerd with sagging grades). We fretted about the human cost of the economic meltdown; unearthed ASSU’s election-tampering; sighed about a largely uneventful, but nevertheless disappointing Canadian election; lamented David Naylor’s corporate-friendly, “Harvard of the North”-obsessed agenda, Toward 2030, as it gained Governing Council’s inevitable approval; and, of course, witnessed Barack Obama win the presidency, covering the historic moment with pride. As the term skids to a rocky finish, the intrigue continues to build. Obama unveiled his administration to a world waiting with bated breath for him to succeed or fail, and our own government redeemed itself for a dull election season by nearly self-destructing. Regrettably, The Varsity won’t be publishing when the results of next week’s vote take effect—when Dion becomes the most unlikely Prime Minister in Canadian history, or Harper assumes the former’s milquetoast reputation by proroguing Parliament—but there’ll be plenty to talk about when we return from our vacations. Of course, most of the headlines lately have been nothing to joke about. Over 170 lives were lost during the recent Mumbai terrorist attacks, the aftermath of which will surely see India-Pakistan relations disintegrate further, while worries mount over the state of South Asia. The Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip continues, while Gazans continue to suffer. In the United States, recession is official; in Canada, it’s forecasted.There’s no shortage of reminders that our exam woes are inconsequential, though the stress remains. Be sure to take a few drops of oil of oregano between Red Bulls, and get to the gym once in awhile—the AC if you’re serious, Hart House if you’re not. Don’t forget, we’re nearing the home stretch. Soon these ephemeral worries will dissolve like snowflakes on shivering skin, and the utter futility of all human endeavours will once again be laid bare before us.HAPPY HOLIDAYS!