While progress and innovation are often attributed to Western scientific principles, our modern understanding of the world is also shaped by diverse and evolving cultural, social, and historical influences, such as traditions, prior experiences, belief systems, and core values. 

Indigenous and Western sciences provide distinct but equally valuable frameworks for research in fields like medicine, psychotherapy, sustainability, and more. By exploring the intersection of these frameworks, and addressing the systemic exclusion of Indigenous voices in the scientific process, we can unlock new opportunities for innovation and collaboration, advancing knowledge in ways that respect and embrace diverse worldviews.

Indigenous science: Emphasizing interconnectedness and spirituality

Indigenous scientific methodologies are deeply intertwined with culture, environment, and community, offering a comprehensive framework that emphasizes interconnectedness. 

In Indigenous science, nature is not merely an object of study but an active participant in the process of building knowledge. Indigenous peoples emphasize the importance of fostering relationships based on mutual respect among individuals, nature, and the spiritual world. Healing methods like storytelling, personal reflection, sharing circles, and ceremonies have been passed down through generations by elders, healers, and community members. Each ceremony contains a natural aspect that consistently links the connection between the body and the surrounding environment. By combining observation, community wisdom, experience, and spiritual insight, Indigenous methods offer a holistic approach to understanding the world.

For instance, Indigenous medicine goes beyond treating physical symptoms by also emphasizing spiritual ceremonial practices. These practices involve rituals centred on restoring harmony between mind, body, and spirit, contributing to the overall well-being of the individual. Traditional healers use natural remedies, personalized songs, prayers, and rituals to address disharmonies within the individual and their relationships with the environment and all of creation. 

Many Indigenous groups practice sweat lodge ceremonies, using natural remedies such as cedar, which is detoxifying and a source of vitamin C, along with personalized songs and prayers that invoke the power of universal elements — Earth, water, fire and air — for spiritual guidance and purification. Until 1951, the Indian Act made the sweat lodge ceremony illegal, turning it into a symbol of resilience for Indigenous peoples once it could be conducted again. The ceremony fosters introspection and restores balance within the individual, strengthening their connection to nature and the spiritual world. In contrast, Western medicine often divides ailments and organs into distinct specialties, sometimes overlooking how health conditions are interrelated. 

Western science: An incomplete approach

Western scientific methodologies are grounded in observation and carefully controlled experiments that aim to affirm “objective truth” — that is, proven and tested facts. These methods often prioritize a third-person perspective when studying nature, while Indigenous cultures emphasize immersion, subjective knowledge, and interconnectedness. 

According to the influential science historian David Charles Lindberg, previous civilizations, such as Ancient Mesopotamia and Egyptian cultures viewed nature as the work of divinity, or considered it inaccessible to humans in our pursuit of knowledge. The Western scientific approach, as we know it today, has its roots in the Ancient Greek and Hellenistic astronomers and physicians, who studied the motion of planets and conducted meticulous dissections of the human body.

In his book The Beginnings of Western Science, Lindberg credits the Western scientific approach with separating nature from the spiritual, allowing for a more secular exploration of the natural world. Although the Western scientific method continues to benefit the lives of billions, breaking down complex systems into isolated variables fails to capture the interconnectedness of natural processes, which Indigenous philosophies hold paramount.

In psychotherapy, cognitive behavioural therapy — focusing on restructuring unhelpful behaviours and thought patterns — and psychoanalysis — focusing on introspection and the unconscious mind — are common treatments within the Western framework for addressing depression, anxiety, and phobias. While these treatments provide valuable insights into individual behaviour and mental processes, they often overlook the social, cultural, and spiritual contexts that significantly influence well-being. 

Western approaches often focus on prescribing medication and one-on-one therapy, rather than addressing the broader cultural and spiritual factors that may exacerbate mental health issues. In contrast, Indigenous perspectives prioritize these contextual aspects, recognizing the individual within the broader framework of family, culture, and environment to offer a more holistic approach to mental health. 

The cost of Eurocentrism in science

Historically, one reason Eurocentric — meaning, focusing on European or white culture and beliefs — approaches dominated the global stage was due to the West’s political, military, and industrial influence. As a result, Indigenous knowledge systems and values were often dismissed as ineffective, negligible, or too unserious for scientific progress, which was narrowly defined by Western standards. This dismissal has not only harmed Indigenous communities but has also restricted the scope of scientific advancement.

The neglect of botanical knowledge in medicine exemplifies the unintended consequences of Eurocentrism in science. Indigenous communities across North America have practiced herbal medicine for millennia, possessing a deep understanding of medicinal plants. However, this knowledge was historically overlooked by Western scientists and later ‘rediscovered’ and commercialized by pharmaceutical companies. For instance, Aspirin, delivered from willow bark, was widely used in Indigenous medicine but received little recognition for its traditional origins, even after pharmaceutical industries capitalized on its fever- and pain-reducing abilities. Integrating this knowledge would not only have amplified the voices of Indigenous healers but also have accelerated the development of effective treatments. 

Similarly, Indigenous communities have long employed sustainable practices to coexist with their environment. Techniques such as controlled forest burns, which maintain ecosystem health and biodiversity, and crop rotation, as in switching crops out yearly, were practiced based on traditional knowledge long before Western science acknowledged their value. These practices contribute to the ongoing efforts to address the intensifying climate crises. 

Building a more inclusive scientific landscape

While distinct, both Indigenous and Western methodologies have their merits. Throughout the 1970s, several North American organizations for Indigenous people in the sciences brought Indigenous science into the spotlight by publishing magazines and organizing workshops aimed at understanding the natural world through an Indigenous lens and influencing education policies. These grassroots efforts culminated in a significant resolution for the American Association for the Advancement of Science — founded in 1848, with the mission to advance science for all — in 1975, which recognized Indigenous scientists and established science programs.

However, for true progress, the integration of these approaches must be grounded in respect and reciprocity. Indigenous communities across Canada have long managed natural resources through traditional ecological knowledge, often alongside Western methods. In some cases, these collaborations have led to more effective conservation strategies. Yet, these efforts must recognize the historical exploitation of Indigenous knowledge and work toward mutual benefit, ensuring that Indigenous contributions are fully credited and valued.

As we confront pressing global challenges, from the climate crisis to mental health, the need to bridge these scientific methodologies becomes increasingly urgent. By recognizing and respecting the legitimacy of diverse knowledge systems, we can foster innovation that is more inclusive and better suited to the varied human experiences and environmental needs we face.